Barrow, Wallis, and the Remaking of Seventeenth Century Indivisibles
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5284777
DOI10.1111/J.1600-0498.1997.TB00025.XzbMATH Open0876.01023OpenAlexW2087299267MaRDI QIDQ5284777FDOQ5284777
Authors: Antoni Malet
Publication date: 12 March 1997
Published in: Centaurus (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0498.1997.tb00025.x
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- ``\dots in Christophorum Clavium de contactu linearum apologia. Considerations on the polemic between Peletier and Clavio upon the angle of tangency (1579-1589)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Philosophical theory and mathematical practice in the seventeenth century
Cited In (8)
- Controversy and modernity. John Wallis and the seventeenth-century debate on the nature of the angle of contact
- Neither ancient nor modern: Wallis and Barrow on the composition of continua. Part two: The seventeenth-century context: The struggle between ancient and modern
- Mengoli on ``Quasi proportions
- The Jesuits and the method of indivisibles
- Seventeenth-century indivisibles revisited
- The introduction of actual infinity in modern science: mathematics and physics in both Cavalieri and Torricelli
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Infinitesimals in the foundations of Newton's mechanics
This page was built for publication: Barrow, Wallis, and the Remaking of Seventeenth Century Indivisibles
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5284777)