Linear and fractional response for the SRB measure of smooth hyperbolic attractors and discontinuous observables

Functional analytic techniques in dynamical systems; zeta functions, (Ruelle-Frobenius) transfer operators, etc. (37C30) Smooth ergodic theory, invariant measures for smooth dynamical systems (37C40) Uniformly hyperbolic systems (expanding, Anosov, Axiom A, etc.) (37D20)

Abstract: We consider a smooth one-parameter family

t o f_{t}

of diffeomorphisms with compact transitive Axiom A attractors. Our first result (corrected) is that for any function

G

in the Sobolev space

H_{p}^{r}

, with

p > 1

and

0 < r < 1 / p

, the map

R (t)

sending

t

to the average of

G

with respect to the SRB measure of

f_{t}

is

a l p h a

-H"older continuous for all

a l p h a < r - | l o g m a t h c a l J | / (p | l o g u_{s} |

) where

m a t h c a l J l e 1

is the strongest volume contraction and

u_{s} < 1

is the weakest contraction. This applies to

h e t a (x) = h (x) T h e t a (g (x) - a)

(for all

a l p h a < 1 - | l o g m a t h c a l J | / | l o g u_{s} |

) for

h

and

g

smooth and

T h e t a

the Heaviside function, if

a

is not a critical value of

g

. Our second result says that for any such function so that, in addition, the intersection of the set of points

x

so that

g (x) = a

with the support of

h

is foliated by "admissible stable leaves" of

f_{t}

, the map

R (t)

is differentiable. (We provide distributional linear response and fluctuation-dissipation formulas for the derivative.) Obtaining linear response or fractional response for such observables is motivated by extreme-value theory. --- Second version, following the referee's comments: We explain better the cone choices around (2.4). Appendix A contains information on the Banach spaces. We added the paragraph containing (2.6) in the proof of Theorem 2.1. In the proof of Theorem 3.3, we do not need to introduce mollifiers. However, the new argument around (2.6) is not available here, so we must replace the pair

(u - 1, | s - 1 |)

by

(u - 2, | s - 2 |)

. This is why we now assume that

h

is

C^{3}

and that

g

and the foliations are

C^{4}

. --- Third version: We have added a corrigendum modifying the first result (Theorem 2.1).

Recommendations

Cites work

Cited in

(24)

This page was built for publication: Linear and fractional response for the SRB measure of smooth hyperbolic attractors and discontinuous observables

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5346743)