Component versus superspace approaches to D = 4, N = 1 conformal supergravity

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5347174

DOI10.1093/PTEP/PTW090zbMATH Open1361.83024arXiv1602.04441OpenAlexW3103173075MaRDI QIDQ5347174FDOQ5347174

Ryo Yokokura, Koichi Yoshioka, Taichiro Kugo

Publication date: 22 May 2017

Published in: PTEP. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The superspace formulation of N=1 conformal supergravity in four dimensions is demonstrated to be equivalent to the conventional component field approach based on the superconformal tensor calculus. The detailed correspondence between two approaches is explicitly given for various quantities; superconformal gauge fields, curvatures and curvature constraints, general conformal multiplets and their transformation laws, and so on. In particular, we carefully analyze the curvature constraints leading to the superconformal algebra and also the superconformal gauge fixing leading to Poincare supergravity since they look rather different between two approaches.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.04441




Recommendations




Cited In (13)





This page was built for publication: Component versus superspace approaches to D = 4, N = 1 conformal supergravity

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5347174)