Not-Post-Peierls compatibility under noisy channels

DOI10.1088/1751-8121/AA72FBzbMATH Open1370.81006arXiv1608.05034OpenAlexW3102816512MaRDI QIDQ5348323FDOQ5348323

Authors: Andrés F. Ducuara, Cristian E. Susa, John H. Reina 

Publication date: 15 August 2017

Published in: Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph (PBR) theorem deals with the realism of the quantum states. It establishes that every pure quantum state is real, in the context of quantum ontological models. Specifically, by guaranteeing the property of not-Post-Peierls ($eg$PP) compatibility (or antidistinguishability) for a particular set of states $P$, together with the ad hoc postulate known as Preparation Independence Postulate (PIP), the theorem establishes that these two properties imply the $psi$-onticity (realism) of the set of all pure states. This PBR result has triggered two particular lines of research: On the one hand, it has been possible to derive similar results without the use of the PIP, although at the expense of implying weaker properties than $psi$-onticity. On the other hand, it has also been proven that the property of $eg$PP compatibility alone is an explicit witness of usefulness for the task known as conclusive exclusion of states. In this work, we explore the $eg$PP compatibility of the set of states $P$, when $P$ is under the interaction of some noisy channels, which would consequently let us identify some noisy scenarios where it is still possible to perform the task of conclusive exclusion of states. Specifically, we consider the set $P$ of $n$-qubit states in interaction with an environment by means of i) individual and ii) collective couplings. In both cases, we analytically show that the phenomenon of achieving $eg$PP compatibility, although reduced, it is still present. Searching for an optimisation of this phenomenon, we report numerical experiments up to $n=4$ qubits.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.05034

Recommendations

• Antidistinguishability of pure quantum states
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7364197
• On the nonreality of the PBR theorem
• Are quantum states real?
• Communication complexity and the reality of the wave function

zbMATH Keywords

noisy channelsrealismPBR theoremconclusive exclusionPost-Peierls compatibility

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Physics (00A79) General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations (81P15) Quantum state estimation, approximate cloning (81P50) Open systems, reduced dynamics, master equations, decoherence (81S22) Channel models (including quantum) in information and communication theory (94A40)

Cites Work

• SDPT3 — A Matlab software package for semidefinite programming, Version 1.3
• Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical
• Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
• Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
• Quantum computation and quantum information. 10th anniversary edition
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• States, effects, and operations. Fundamental notions of quantum theory. Lectures in mathematical physics at the University of Texas at Austin. Ed. by A. Böhm, J. D. Dollard and W. H. Wootters
• Are quantum states real?
• A system’s wave function is uniquely determined by its underlying physical state

Cited In (1)

• Antidistinguishability of pure quantum states

Uses Software

• SDPT3
• YALMIP

This page was built for publication: Not-Post-Peierls compatibility under noisy channels

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5348323)