Do prices coordinate markets?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5361850
Abstract: Walrasian equilibrium prices can be said to coordinate markets: They support a welfare optimal allocation in which each buyer is buying bundle of goods that is individually most preferred. However, this clean story has two caveats. First, the prices alone are not sufficient to coordinate the market, and buyers may need to select among their most preferred bundles in a coordinated way to find a feasible allocation. Second, we don't in practice expect to encounter exact equilibrium prices tailored to the market, but instead only approximate prices, somehow encoding "distributional" information about the market. How well do prices work to coordinate markets when tie-breaking is not coordinated, and they encode only distributional information? We answer this question. First, we provide a genericity condition such that for buyers with Matroid Based Valuations, overdemand with respect to equilibrium prices is at most 1, independent of the supply of goods, even when tie-breaking is done in an uncoordinated fashion. Second, we provide learning-theoretic results that show that such prices are robust to changing the buyers in the market, so long as all buyers are sampled from the same (unknown) distribution.
Recommendations
Cited in
(9)- Do Prices Determine Vertical Integration?
- Market pricing for matroid rank valuations
- When are welfare guarantees robust?
- Pricing to maximize revenue and welfare simultaneously in large markets
- A Dual Approach for Dynamic Pricing in Multidemand Markets
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7765397 (Why is no real title available?)
- Computing Walrasian equilibria: fast algorithms and structural properties
- Counteracting inequality in markets via convex pricing
- On price versus quality
This page was built for publication: Do prices coordinate markets?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5361850)