What Hamblin's formal dialectic tells about the medieval logical disputation

DOI10.21146/2074-1472-2017-23-1-151-176MaRDI QIDQ5365409zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Aleksandra Mikhaĭlovna Pavlova

Publication date 6 October 2017

Published in Logical Investigations (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-1472-2017-23-1-151-176

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationbelief revisiondialogue logicformal dialecticsgameHamblinmedieval disputes of obligationes

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History of mathematics in Late Antiquity and medieval Europe (01A35) History of mathematical logic and foundations (03-03) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• Obligationes as formal dialogue systems
• Medieval \textit{obligationes} as logical games of consistency maintenance
• Interactive logic in the middle ages
• Formalizing medieval logical theories. Suppositio, consequentiae and obligationes
• Medieval logic

Cited in

(4)

• Formalizing medieval logical theories. Suppositio, consequentiae and obligationes
• Robert Kilwardby's disputational logic
• Obligationes as formal dialogue systems
• Oral Disputation in theGymnasium Logicumby Bartholomäus Keckermann and Dependent Seventeenth Century Tracts

This page was built for publication: What Hamblin's formal dialectic tells about the medieval logical disputation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5365409)