LCL problems on grids

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5368949

DOI10.1145/3087801.3087833zbMATH Open1380.68218arXiv1702.05456OpenAlexW2593376981MaRDI QIDQ5368949FDOQ5368949


Authors: Sebastian F. Brandt, Juho Hirvonen, Janne H. Korhonen, Tuomo Lempiäinen, Patric R. J. Östergård, Christopher Purcell, Joel Rybicki, Jukka Suomela, Przemysław Uznański Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 11 October 2017

Published in: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: LCLs or locally checkable labelling problems (e.g. maximal independent set, maximal matching, and vertex colouring) in the LOCAL model of computation are very well-understood in cycles (toroidal 1-dimensional grids): every problem has a complexity of O(1), Theta(logn), or Theta(n), and the design of optimal algorithms can be fully automated. This work develops the complexity theory of LCL problems for toroidal 2-dimensional grids. The complexity classes are the same as in the 1-dimensional case: O(1), Theta(logn), and Theta(n). However, given an LCL problem it is undecidable whether its complexity is Theta(logn) or Theta(n) in 2-dimensional grids. Nevertheless, if we correctly guess that the complexity of a problem is Theta(logn), we can completely automate the design of optimal algorithms. For any problem we can find an algorithm that is of a normal form AcircSk, where A is a finite function, Sk is an algorithm for finding a maximal independent set in kth power of the grid, and k is a constant. Finally, partially with the help of automated design tools, we classify the complexity of several concrete LCL problems related to colourings and orientations.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.05456




Recommendations





Cited In (16)





This page was built for publication: LCL problems on grids

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5368949)