Making the Cut: Improved Ranking and Selection for Large-Scale Inference

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5378369

DOI10.1111/RSSB.12131zbMATH Open1414.62064arXiv1312.5776OpenAlexW2155049373WikidataQ37200981 ScholiaQ37200981MaRDI QIDQ5378369FDOQ5378369


Authors: Nicholas C. Henderson, Michael A. Newton Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 12 June 2019

Published in: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Identifying leading measurement units from a large collection is a common inference task in various domains of large-scale inference. Testing approaches, which measure evidence against a null hypothesis rather than effect magnitude, tend to overpopulate lists of leading units with those associated with low measurement error. By contrast, local maximum likelihood (ML) approaches tend to favor units with high measurement error. Available Bayesian and empirical Bayesian approaches rely on specialized loss functions that result in similar deficiencies. We describe and evaluate a generic empirical Bayesian ranking procedure that populates the list of top units in a way that maximizes the expected overlap between the true and reported top lists for all list sizes. The procedure relates unit-specific posterior upper tail probabilities with their empirical distribution to yield a ranking variable. It discounts high-variance units less than popular non-ML methods and thus achieves improved operating characteristics in the models considered.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5776




Recommendations





Cited In (7)





This page was built for publication: Making the Cut: Improved Ranking and Selection for Large-Scale Inference

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5378369)