Coding accuracy is not fully determined by the neuronal model
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5380237
DOI10.1162/NECO_A_00724zbMATH Open1414.92100OpenAlexW2155548699WikidataQ50955491 ScholiaQ50955491MaRDI QIDQ5380237FDOQ5380237
Authors: Lubomir Kostal, Petr Lansky
Publication date: 4 June 2019
Published in: Neural Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_00724
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Introduction to Theoretical Neurobiology
- Fisher and Shannon information in finite neural populations
- Metabolic cost of neuronal information in an empirical stimulus-response model
- Optimal Short-Term Population Coding: When Fisher Information Fails
- Detection estimation and modulation theory. Part I. Detection, estimation, and filtering theory
- Population coding and the labeling problem: extrinsic versus intrinsic representations
Cited In (4)
- Stimulus reference frame and neural coding precision
- Effect of spontaneous activity on stimulus detection in a simple neuronal model
- Presynaptic spontaneous activity enhances the accuracy of latency coding
- Coordinate invariance as a fundamental constraint on the form of stimulus-specific information measures
This page was built for publication: Coding accuracy is not fully determined by the neuronal model
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5380237)