Assessing quality improvement initiatives when expert judgements are uncertain

DOI10.1057/PALGRAVE.JORS.2602484MaRDI QIDQ5387376zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Eugene D. Hahn, C. L. Knott

Publication date 9 May 2008

Published in The Journal of the Operational Research Society (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602484

zbMATH Keywords

decision support systemsgeographic information systemsgovernmentgroup decision makingstochastic multi-criteria decision making

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Recommendations

• Optimal Data Quality
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4185383
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2106830
• Bayes estimates of muIti-criteria decision alternatives using Monte Carlo integration
• A Bayesian Approach to 2000 Census Evaluation Using ACE Survey Data and Demographic Analysis

Cited in

(1)

• Allocation of quality improvement targets based on investments in learning

This page was built for publication: Assessing quality improvement initiatives when expert judgements are uncertain

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5387376)