A Counterpoint to Cermelli and Gurtin’s Criteria for Choosing the ‘Correct’ Geometric Dislocation Tensor in Finite Plasticity

DOI10.1007/978-1-4020-9090-5_9zbMath1209.74017OpenAlexW1001087653MaRDI QIDQ5391684

Amit Acharya

Publication date: 7 April 2011

Published in: IUTAM BookSeries (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9090-5_9

zbMATH Keywords

finite deformationdislocationsgradient plasticity

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Large-strain, rate-dependent theories of plasticity (74C20)

Related Items (5)

Finite element approximation of finite deformation dislocation mechanics ⋮ A fourth-order gauge-invariant gradient plasticity model for polycrystals based on Kröner’s incompatibility tensor ⋮ A Variational Approach to Single Crystals with Dislocations ⋮ Riemann-Cartan geometry of nonlinear dislocation mechanics ⋮ Characterizing geometrically necessary dislocations using an elastic-plastic decomposition of Laplace stretch

Cites Work

• Constitutive analysis of finite deformation field dislocation mechanics
• Lattice incompatibility and a gradient theory of crystal plasticity
• Second-order effects of dislocations in anisotropic crystals
• A model of crystal plasticity based on the theory of continuously distributed dislocations
• On the characterization of geometrically necessary dislocations in finite plasticity
• A gradient theory of single-crystal viscoplasticity that accounts for geometrically necessary dislocations

This page was built for publication: A Counterpoint to Cermelli and Gurtin’s Criteria for Choosing the ‘Correct’ Geometric Dislocation Tensor in Finite Plasticity