Bolzano's concept of grounding (\textit{Abfolge}) against the background of normal proofs
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5402234
Recommendations
Cites work
- Balzano's theory of ground and consequence
- Bolzano and Cournot on mathematical explanation
- Etchemendy and Bolzano on logical consequence
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3174456 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2168553 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3275554 (Why is no real title available?)
- Meaning approached via proofs
- On the idea of a general proof theory
- The consistency of arithmetics
- The problem of apagogic proof in Bolzano's \textit{Contributions} and his \textit{Theory of science}
- Untersuchungen über das logische Schliessen. I
- Validity concepts in proof-theoretic semantics
Cited in
(26)- Balzano's theory of ground and consequence
- On constructing a logic for the notion of complete and immediate formal grounding
- Bolzano and Kim on grounding and unification
- Grounding, quantifiers, and paradoxes
- Defining formal explanation in classical logic by substructural derivability
- On Bolzano's alleged explicativism
- Grounding principles for (relevant) implication
- Bolzano's conception of grounding
- Studies on Bolzano
- Bernard Bolzano's theory of ground and consequence. An axiomatic reconstruction
- Rigor, re-proof and Bolzano's critical program
- Explanation in metaphysics and Bolzano's theory of ground and consequence
- A Critical Overview of the Most Recent Logics of Grounding
- The concepts of proof and ground
- Toward a generalization of the logic of grounding
- Conceptions of Proof from Aristotle to Gentzen’s Calculi
- On defining the notion of complete and immediate formal grounding
- Husserl's logical grammar
- EARLY BOLZANO ONGROUND-CONSEQUENCEPROOFS
- Formal explanations as logical derivations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7644093 (Why is no real title available?)
- (Conceptual) explanations in logic
- Intensionality of consequence and identity of proofs in Prawitz's theory of grounds
- What stands between grounding rules and logical rules is the excluded middle
- Conceptual (and hence mathematical) explanation, conceptual grounding and proof
- Purity and explanation: a systematic case study
This page was built for publication: Bolzano's concept of grounding (\textit{Abfolge}) against the background of normal proofs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5402234)