J.-H. Lambert's theory of probable syllogisms

DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2009.06.011MaRDI QIDQ541815zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Thierry Martin

Publication date 8 June 2011

Published in International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2009.06.011

zbMATH Keywords

epistemic probabilityLambertprobability of testimonyprobable syllogism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History of mathematics in the 18th century (01A50) History of mathematical logic and foundations (03-03) Probability and inductive logic (03B48) Many-valued logic (03B50)

Review text

This short paper investigates J.-H. Lambert's theory of probable syllogism and makes the case for a modern treatment of the principles underlying Lambert's work from the 1760s. After a brief introduction, the author puts Lambert's work in a wider context by considering the work of some of Lambert's contemporaries. Lambert's approach is a renewal of Aristotelian logic by incorporating probability theory. The two main new ingredients are the Leibnizian principle of \textit{mathesis universalis} and a theory of appearance. To separate the field of the probable from the field of the true, Lambert distinguishes two types of proof. On the one hand there are rigorous deductions by a sequence of propositions, on the other hand there are ``moral arguments yielding moral proofs. To construct his model of probable syllogism, Lambert distinguishes three classes of probabilities: i) a priori probability, ii) a posteriori probability, and iii) probability of inductions. In the fourth section the author studies Lambert's treatment of propositions such as ``some \(A\) are \(B\) in the underlying model of a lottery (gambling). Thus the probability of a proposition is identified with a degree of certainty. In particular the author applies Lambert's classification of propositions which are taken to either true, indeterminate or false. In the fifth section the author shows how the developed theory can be applied to testimonies, in particular the credibility of testimonies. Section 6 contains the conclusions in which the author states that Lambert's aim is to study probabilistic reasoning for the purpose of determining the probability of testimonies.

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5080645
• Probability logic
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3851013
• The development of probability logic from leibniz to maccoll
• Intensional vs extensional probabilities from their origins to Laplace

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5813570 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4074167 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6745041 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3278985 (Why is no real title available?)
• J. H. Lambert's work on probability
• La logique probabiliste de Gabriel Cramer
• Lambert and the life table
• Non-additive probabilities in the work of Bernoulli and Lambert
• The probabilistic analysis of testimony

Cited in

(6)

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5080645 (Why is no real title available?)
• La logique probabiliste de Gabriel Cramer
• Johann Heinrich Lambert's scientific tool kit, exemplified by his measurement of humidity, 1769-1772
• Jesuit probabilistic logic between scholastic and academic philosophy
• Probability propagation rules for Aristotelian syllogisms
• Elements for a history of artificial intelligence

This page was built for publication: J.-H. Lambert's theory of probable syllogisms

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q541815)