Inhomogeneous coupling in two-channel asymmetric simple exclusion processes

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5454595

DOI10.1088/1751-8113/41/9/095002zbMATH Open1139.82030arXiv0711.1507OpenAlexW2053169077MaRDI QIDQ5454595FDOQ5454595


Authors:


Publication date: 31 March 2008

Published in: Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Asymmetric exclusion processes for particles moving on parallel channels with inhomogeneous coupling are investigated theoretically. Particles interact with hard-core exclusion and move in the same direction on both lattices, while transitions between the channels is allowed at one specific location in the bulk of the system. An approximate theoretical approach that describes the dynamics in the vertical link and horizontal lattice segments exactly but neglects the correlation between the horizontal and vertical transport is developed. It allows us to calculate stationary phase diagrams, particle currents and densities for symmetric and asymmetric transitions between the channels. It is shown that in the case of the symmetric coupling there are three stationary phases, similarly to the case of single-channel totally asymmetric exclusion processes with local inhomogeneity. However, the asymmetric coupling between the lattices lead to a very complex phase diagram with ten stationary-state regimes. Extensive Monte Carlo computer simulations generally support theoretical predictions, although simulated stationary-state properties slightly deviate from calculated in the mean-field approximation, suggesting the importance of correlations in the system. Dynamic properties and phase diagrams are discussed by analyzing constraints on the particle currents across the channels.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0711.1507




Recommendations





Cited In (8)





This page was built for publication: Inhomogeneous coupling in two-channel asymmetric simple exclusion processes

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5454595)