PROMETHEUS BOUND: POLARIZATION IS POSSIBLE IN THE NEOCLASSICAL GROWTH MODEL

DOI10.1111/J.1467-999X.2008.00300.XzbMATH Open1133.91485OpenAlexW2166830931MaRDI QIDQ5459937FDOQ5459937

Loukas Theocharis, Efthymios G. Tsionas

Publication date: 30 April 2008

Published in: Metroeconomica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-999x.2008.00300.x

Recommendations

• Could Prometheus be bound again? A contribution to the convergence controversy
• A note on the empirics of the neoclassical growth model
• On capital accumulation paths in a neoclassical stochastic growth model
• A note on an open economy neoclassical model
• Convergence empirics across economies with (some) capital mobility.

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Economic growth models (91B62)

Cites Work

• Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach
• Could Prometheus be bound again? A contribution to the convergence controversy

This page was built for publication: PROMETHEUS BOUND: POLARIZATION IS POSSIBLE IN THE NEOCLASSICAL GROWTH MODEL

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5459937)