KLEIN PARADOX FOR OPTICAL SCATTERING FROM EXCITED TARGETS
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5484787
DOI10.1142/S0217751X06031582zbMATH Open1099.81589arXiv0711.0704OpenAlexW2106898136WikidataQ58350587 ScholiaQ58350587MaRDI QIDQ5484787FDOQ5484787
Y. N. Srivastava, Orlando Panella, A. Widom
Publication date: 21 August 2006
Published in: International Journal of Modern Physics A (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: The well known Klein paradox for the relativistic Dirac wave equation consists in the computation of possible ``negative probabilities induced by certain potentials in some regimes of energy. The paradox may be resolved employing the notion of electron-positron pair production in which the number of electrons present in a process can increase. The Klein paradox also exists in Maxwell's equations viewed as the wave equation for photons. In a medium containing ``inverted energy populations of excited atoms, e.g. in a LASER medium, one may again compute possible ``negative probabilities. The resolution of the electromagnetic Klein paradox is that when the atoms decay, the final state may contain more photons then were contained the initial state. The optical theorem total cross section for scattering photons from excited state atoms may then be computed as negative within a frequency band with matter induced amplification.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0711.0704
Recommendations
Diffraction, scattering (78A45) Lasers, masers, optical bistability, nonlinear optics (78A60) Quantum optics (81V80)
Cites Work
Cited In (5)
- On Resolutions of the Klein Paradox
- On Peres' statement ``Opposite momenta lead to opposite directions, decaying systems and optical imaging
- Klein paradox for the charged Klein-Gordon equation: superradiance and scattering.
- The Lindley paradox in optical interferometry
- INSTABILITY OF THE PERTURBATION THEORETICAL CHROMODYNAMIC VACUUM
This page was built for publication: KLEIN PARADOX FOR OPTICAL SCATTERING FROM EXCITED TARGETS
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5484787)