On non-abelian Brumer and Brumer-Stark conjecture for monomial CM-extensions

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5494546

DOI10.1142/S1793042114500018zbMATH Open1296.11149arXiv1307.1279WikidataQ123277602 ScholiaQ123277602MaRDI QIDQ5494546FDOQ5494546


Authors: Jiro Nomura Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 28 July 2014

Published in: International Journal of Number Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Let K/k be a finite Galois CM-extension of number fields whose Galois group G is monomial and S a finite set of places of k. Then the "Stickelberger element" hetaK/k,S is defined. Concerning this element, Andreas Nickel formulated the non-abelian Brumer and Brumer-Stark conjectures and their "weak" versions. In this paper, when G is a monomial group, we prove that the weak non-abelian conjectures are reduced to the weak conjectures for abelian subextensions. We write D4p,Q2n+2 and A4 for the dihedral group of order 4p for any odd prime p, the generalized quaternion group of order 2n+2 for any natural number n and the alternating group on 4 letters respectively. Suppose that G is isomorphic to D4p, Q2n+2 or A4imesmathbbZ/2mathbbZ. Then we prove the l-parts of the weak non-abelian conjectures, where l=2 in the quaternion case, and l is an arbitrary prime which does not split in mathbbQ(zetap) in the dihedral case and in mathbbQ(zeta3) in the alternating case. In particular, we do not exclude the 2-part of the conjectures and do not assume that S contains all finite places which ramify in K/k in contrast with Nickel's formulation.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.1279




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (17)





This page was built for publication: On non-abelian Brumer and Brumer-Stark conjecture for monomial CM-extensions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5494546)