Equivalence of deterministic one-counter automata is NL-complete
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:5495783)
Abstract: We prove that language equivalence of deterministic one-counter automata is NL-complete. This improves the superpolynomial time complexity upper bound shown by Valiant and Paterson in 1975. Our main contribution is to prove that two deterministic one-counter automata are inequivalent if and only if they can be distinguished by a word of length polynomial in the size of the two input automata.
Recommendations
Cited in
(16)- A generic framework for checking semantic equivalences between pushdown automata and finite-state automata
- Trace inclusion for one-counter nets revisited
- Bisimulation equivalence and regularity for real-time one-counter automata
- Language equivalence of deterministic real-time one-counter automata is NL-complete
- Trace inclusion for one-counter nets revisited
- On distinguishing \(\mathbf {NC^1}\) and \(\mathbf {NL}\)
- On Büchi one-counter automata
- The Hoare logic of deterministic and nondeterministic monadic recursion schemes
- Countdown games, and simulation on (succinct) one-counter nets
- Input-driven multi-counter automata
- On history-deterministic one-counter nets
- The different shades of infinite session types
- Invariants for one-counter automata with disequality tests
- Equivalence of deterministic weighted real-time one-counter automata
- Parikh one-counter automata
- Weighted one-deterministic-counter automata
This page was built for publication: Equivalence of deterministic one-counter automata is NL-complete
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5495783)