Simplicial vertices in graphs with no induced four-edge path or four-edge antipath, and the H₆-conjecture
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5495885
Abstract: Let be the class of all graphs with no induced four-edge path or four-edge antipath. Hayward and Nastos cite{MS} conjectured that every prime graph in not isomorphic to the cycle of length five is either a split graph or contains a certain useful arrangement of simplicial and antisimplicial vertices. In this paper we give a counterexample to their conjecture, and prove a slightly weaker version. Additionally, applying a result of the first author and Seymour cite{grow} we give a short proof of Fouquet's result cite{C5} on the structure of the subclass of bull-free graphs contained in .
Recommendations
- Large cliques or stable sets in graphs with no four-edge path and no five-edge path in the complement
- Excluding paths and antipaths
- The structure of bull-free graphs I -- three-edge-paths with centers and anticenters
- Graphs with No Induced Five‐Vertex Path or Antipath
- Triangle-free graphs with no six-vertex induced path
Cites work
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: Simplicial vertices in graphs with no induced four-edge path or four-edge antipath, and the \(H_{6}\)-conjecture
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5495885)