Reply to ‘Comment on ‘Almost-periodic time observables for bound quantum systems’’

DOI10.1088/1751-8113/42/1/018002MaRDI QIDQ5504734zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Michael J. W. Hall

Publication date 22 January 2009

Published in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.3312

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Closed and approximate solutions to the Schrödinger, Dirac, Klein-Gordon and other equations of quantum mechanics (81Q05)

Abstract: In a recent paper [1] (also at http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0803.3721), I made several critical remarks on a 'Hermitian time operator' proposed by Galapon [2] (also at http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0111061). Galapon has correctly pointed out that remarks pertaining to 'denseness' of the commutator domain are wrong [3]. However, the other remarks still apply, and it is further noted that a given quantum system can be a member of this domain only at a set of times of total measure zero.

Recommendations

• Comment on ‘Almost-periodic time observables for bound quantum systems’
• Editorial Note on Comment by E A Galapon and Reply by M J W Hall
• Almost-periodic time observables for bound quantum systems
• Response to Dr. Pashby: Time operators and POVM observables in quantum mechanics
• The Pauli objection

Cited in

(2)

• Comment on ‘Almost-periodic time observables for bound quantum systems’
• Editorial Note on Comment by E A Galapon and Reply by M J W Hall

This page was built for publication: Reply to ‘Comment on ‘Almost-periodic time observables for bound quantum systems’’

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5504734)