How to improve snap-stabilizing point-to-point communication space complexity?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:555308
DOI10.1016/j.tcs.2010.11.014zbMath1217.68027OpenAlexW2071998903MaRDI QIDQ555308
Swan Dubois, Vincent Villain, Alain Cournier
Publication date: 22 July 2011
Published in: Theoretical Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2010.11.014
Distributed systems (68M14) Reliability, testing and fault tolerance of networks and computer systems (68M15) Network protocols (68M12)
Related Items (2)
Stabilizing data-link over non-FIFO channels with optimal fault-resilience ⋮ How to improve snap-stabilizing point-to-point communication space complexity?
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- How to improve snap-stabilizing point-to-point communication space complexity?
- A self-stabilizing algorithm for constructing breadth-first trees
- Relaxing the uniformity and independence assumptions using the concept of fractal dimension
- Optimal fully adaptive minimal wormhole routing for meshes
- Snap-stabilization and PIF in tree networks
- Deadlock-Free Packet Switching Networks
- Some Complexity Results in the Design of Deadlock-Free Packet Switching Networks
- Distributed computation on graphs
- Self-stabilizing systems in spite of distributed control
- Introduction to Distributed Algorithms
- Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics
This page was built for publication: How to improve snap-stabilizing point-to-point communication space complexity?