On the power of Ambainis lower bounds

From MaRDI portal
Publication:557899

DOI10.1016/J.TCS.2005.01.019zbMATH Open1142.68367arXivquant-ph/0311060OpenAlexW2001383654MaRDI QIDQ557899FDOQ557899


Authors: Shengyu Zhang Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 30 June 2005

Published in: Theoretical Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The polynomial method and the Ambainis's lower bound (or emph{Alb}, for short) method are two main quantum lower bound techniques. While recently Ambainis showed that the polynomial method is not tight, the present paper aims at studying the power and limitation of emph{Alb}'s. We first use known emph{Alb}'s to derive Omega(n1.5) lower bounds for extsc{Bipartiteness}, extsc{Bipartiteness Matching} and extsc{Graph Matching}, in which the lower bound for extsc{Bipartiteness} improves the previous Omega(n) one. We then show that all the three known Ambainis's lower bounds have a limitation sqrtNcdotminC0(f),C1(f), where C0(f) and C1(f) are the 0- and 1-certificate complexity, respectively. This implies that for some problems such as extsc{Triangle}, k- extsc{Clique}, and extsc{Bipartite/Graph Matching} which draw wide interest and whose quantum query complexities are still open, the best known lower bounds cannot be further improved by using Ambainis's techniques. Another consequence is that all the Ambainis's lower bounds are not tight. For total functions, this upper bound for emph{Alb}'s can be further improved to minsqrtC0(f)C1(f),sqrtNcdotCI(f), where CI(f) is the size of max intersection of a 0-and a 1-certificate set. Again this implies that Alb's cannot improve the best known lower bound for some specific problems such as extsc{And-Or Tree}, whose precise quantum query complexity is still open. Finally, we generalize the three known emph{Alb}'s and give a new emph{Alb} style lower bound method, which may be easier to use for some problems.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0311060




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (19)





This page was built for publication: On the power of Ambainis lower bounds

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q557899)