How Changing D[[ x ]] Changes Its Quotient Field

Cited in

(30)

Conducive integral domains as pullbacks
Ahmes expansions of formal Laurent series and a class of nonarchimedean integral domains
Seminormality and root closure in polynomial rings and algebraic curves
D-automorphisms of power series rings and the continuous radical of D
Root closure in integral domains
Transcendence degree in power series rings
Transcendental degree in power series rings
Jump of a domain and spectrally balanced domains
Classical ideal semigroups
Reduced Archimedean skew polynomial rings and skew power series rings
Two counterexamples involving complete integral closure in finite- dimensional Prüfer domains
Fragmented domains have infinite Krull dimension
Power series over Noetherian domains, Nagata rings, and Kronecker function rings
Chain of Prime Ideals in Formal Power Series Rings
On the Compositum of Two Power Series Rings
On Analytic Independence
LCM-Stability of Power Series Extensions Characterizes Dedekind Domains
On reduced Archimedean skew power series rings
Some results on \(S\)-accr pairs
Pseudo-powerful ideals in an integral domain
Archimedean skew generalized power series rings
Root closure of ideals
Generalization of Artinian rings and the formal power series rings
On root closedness in generalized power series rings
A calculation of the perfectoidization of semiperfectoid rings
Elementary divisors, Hochster duality, and spectra
Derivations and root closures of graded ideals
When is a power series ring \(n\)-root closed?
Archimedean domains of skew generalized power series
Root closure

This page was built for publication: How Changing Dx Changes Its Quotient Field

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5634084)