Fidelity in Mathematical Discourse: Is One and One Really Two?

DOI10.2307/2316620zbMath0229.02006OpenAlexW2084570579MaRDI QIDQ5636838

Philip J. Davis

Publication date: 1972

Published in: The American Mathematical Monthly (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2316620

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items (12)

Mathematical naturalism: origins, guises, and prospects ⋮ Miracles, misconceptions and scotomas in the theory of solitary waves ⋮ The role of testimony in mathematics ⋮ Social processes and proofs of theorems and programs ⋮ Experimental mathematics, computers and the a priori ⋮ Values, gender and images of mathematics: a philosophical perspective ⋮ Mathematics has a front and a back ⋮ Is mathematics problem solving or theorem proving? ⋮ Mathematical arguments in context ⋮ Linearity and Reflexivity in the Growth of Mathematical Knowledge ⋮ Some proposals for reviving the philosophy of mathematics ⋮ Acceptable gaps in mathematical proofs

This page was built for publication: Fidelity in Mathematical Discourse: Is One and One Really Two?