The effect of mixing‐distribution misspecification in conjugate mixture models
DOI10.2307/3315741zbMATH Open0863.62021OpenAlexW2038692007MaRDI QIDQ5691189FDOQ5691189
Authors: Paul Gustafson
Publication date: 3 June 1997
Published in: The Canadian Journal of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/3315741
Recommendations
- Model misspecification effects in clustered count data analysis
- Bias from misspecification of the component variances in a normal mixture
- Misspecifying the shape of a random effects distribution: why getting it wrong may not matter
- Posterior consistency of random effects models for binary data
- Misspecifying the likelihood for clustered binary data.
mixture modelsbeta-binomialclustered datahierarchical modelmodel misspecificationrobustnessconditional distributionasymptotic biasmarginal distributionmixing distributionresponse variablemaximum-likelihood estimatorsinfinitesimal contaminationcluster-specificlatter distribution
Asymptotic properties of parametric estimators (62F12) Bayesian inference (62F15) Robustness and adaptive procedures (parametric inference) (62F35)
Cites Work
Cited In (5)
- On robustness of maximum likelihood estimates for Poisson-lognormal models.
- Bias from misspecification of the component variances in a normal mixture
- Random-intercept misspecification in generalized linear mixed models for binary responses
- Posterior consistency of random effects models for binary data
- Bias of the structural quasi-score estimator of a measurement error model under misspecification of the regressor distribution
This page was built for publication: The effect of mixing‐distribution misspecification in conjugate mixture models
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5691189)