The effect of mixing‐distribution misspecification in conjugate mixture models
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5691189
Recommendations
- Model misspecification effects in clustered count data analysis
- Bias from misspecification of the component variances in a normal mixture
- Misspecifying the shape of a random effects distribution: why getting it wrong may not matter
- Posterior consistency of random effects models for binary data
- Misspecifying the likelihood for clustered binary data.
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3954047 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3246461 (Why is no real title available?)
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models
- Robust Bayesian analysis of the binomial empirical Bayes problem
- The range of the (n + 1)th moment for distributions on [0, 1]
Cited in
(5)- Bias of the structural quasi-score estimator of a measurement error model under misspecification of the regressor distribution
- On robustness of maximum likelihood estimates for Poisson-lognormal models.
- Bias from misspecification of the component variances in a normal mixture
- Random-intercept misspecification in generalized linear mixed models for binary responses
- Posterior consistency of random effects models for binary data
This page was built for publication: The effect of mixing‐distribution misspecification in conjugate mixture models
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5691189)