A Two-Stage Procedure for Selection and Assessment of Agreement of the Best Instrument with a Gold Standard
DOI10.1081/SQA-200063273zbMATH Open1072.62011MaRDI QIDQ5697356FDOQ5697356
Authors: Pankaj K. Choudhary, H. N. Nagaraja
Publication date: 17 October 2005
Published in: Sequential Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Recommendations
- Selecting the instrument closest to a gold standard
- Evaluating Agreement with a Gold Standard in Method Comparison Studies
- A general approach to evaluating agreement between two observers or methods of measurement from quantitative data with replicated measurements
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 218753
- Assessment of agreement using intersection-union principle
multivariate normal distributionagreementconcordancetwo-stage procedureselection of the bestheart-rate data
Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Statistical ranking and selection procedures (62F07) Sequential statistical analysis (62L10) Statistical decision theory (62C99)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A Two-Sample Test for a Linear Hypothesis Whose Power is Independent of the Variance
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A Weighted Concordance Correlation Coefficient for Repeated Measurement Designs
- Confidence intervals associated with tests for bioequivalence
- Asymptotic considerations for selecting the best component of a multivariate normal population
- Selecting the instrument closest to a gold standard
Cited In (2)
This page was built for publication: A Two-Stage Procedure for Selection and Assessment of Agreement of the Best Instrument with a Gold Standard
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5697356)