Comparing disease screening tests when true disease status is ascertained only for screen positives

DOI10.1093/BIOSTATISTICS/2.3.249MaRDI QIDQ5701255zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Margaret Sullivan Pepe, Todd A. Alonzo

Publication date 2 November 2005

Published in Biostatistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/2.3.249

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Medical applications (general) (92C50)

Recommendations

• A Novel Design for Estimating Relative Accuracy of Screening Tests When Complete Disease Verification Is Not Feasible
• Comparing Accuracies of Two Screening Tests in a Two-Phase Study for Dementia
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1556440
• Treatment comparisons with screenable endpoints.
• Comparing accuracy in an unpaired post-market device study with incomplete disease assessment

Cited in

(12)

• Treatment comparisons with screenable endpoints.
• Inverse probability weighting estimation of the volume under the ROC surface in the presence of verification bias
• Testing the Independence of Two Diagnostic Tests
• A general latent class model for performance evaluation of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard: an application to Chagas disease
• Comparing accuracy in an unpaired post-market device study with incomplete disease assessment
• Some issues concerning the statistical evaluation of a screening test: the arfi ultrasound case
• A Novel Design for Estimating Relative Accuracy of Screening Tests When Complete Disease Verification Is Not Feasible
• Covariate-adjusted Bayesian estimation of the performance of a continuous diagnostic test with a limit of detection in the absence of a reference standard: a simulation study
• Extending Hui-Walter framework to correlated outcomes with application to diagnosis tests of an eye disease among premature infants
• Comparing the accuracy of screening tests with verification of disease status restricted to test positives
• Using relative statistics and approximate disease prevalence to compare screening tests
• Corrected ROC analysis for misclassified binary outcomes

This page was built for publication: Comparing disease screening tests when true disease status is ascertained only for screen positives

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5701255)