Bounding-surface plasticity: Stress space versus strain space
From MaRDI portal
Publication:583934
DOI10.1007/BF01379741zbMath0692.73035OpenAlexW2082137223MaRDI QIDQ583934
P. J. Yoder, David L. McDowell
Publication date: 1989
Published in: Acta Mechanica (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01379741
Related Items (3)
A robust kinematic hardening rule for cyclic plasticity with ratchetting effects. II: Application to nonproportional loading cases ⋮ The equivalence of stress- and strain-based plasticity theories ⋮ Integral-equation representations of flow elastoplasticity derived from rate-equation models
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- A model of nonlinearity hardening materials for complex loading
- The significance of formulating plasticity theory with reference to loading surfaces in strain space
- On the Numerical Implementation of Elastoplastic Models
- A Two Surface Model for Transient Nonproportional Cyclic Plasticity, Part 1: Development of Appropriate Equations
- A Two Surface Model for Transient Nonproportional Cyclic Plasticity, Part 2: Comparison of Theory With Experiments
- On the Formulation of Strain-Space Plasticity With Multiple Loading Surfaces
- On the Characterization of Strain-Hardening in Plasticity
- Plastic Internal Variables Formalism of Cyclic Plasticity
- An Evaluation of Recent Developments in Hardening and Flow Rules for Rate-Independent, Nonproportional Cyclic Plasticity
This page was built for publication: Bounding-surface plasticity: Stress space versus strain space
