THE EXACT STRENGTH OF THE CLASS FORCING THEOREM
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5855740
DOI10.1017/jsl.2019.89zbMath1485.03216arXiv1707.03700OpenAlexW2735560022MaRDI QIDQ5855740
Philipp Schlicht, Joel David Hamkins, Victoria Gitman, Kameryn J. Williams, Peter Holy
Publication date: 19 March 2021
Published in: The Journal of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.03700
Nonclassical and second-order set theories (03E70) Other aspects of forcing and Boolean-valued models (03E40)
Related Items (8)
AN AXIOMATIC APPROACH TO FORCING IN A GENERAL SETTING ⋮ Inner-model reflection principles ⋮ First‐order undefinability of the notion of transfinitely uplifting cardinals ⋮ Choiceless large cardinals and set‐theoretic potentialism ⋮ VARIETIES OF CLASS-THEORETIC POTENTIALISM ⋮ Kelley–Morse set theory does not prove the class Fodor principle ⋮ MINIMUM MODELS OF SECOND-ORDER SET THEORIES ⋮ Boolean-valued class forcing
Cites Work
- Algebraicity and implicit definability in set theory
- Classes and truths in set theory
- Characterizations of pretameness and the Ord-cc
- RELATIVE PREDICATIVITY AND DEPENDENT RECURSION IN SECOND-ORDER SET THEORY AND HIGHER-ORDER THEORIES
- CLASS FORCING, THE FORCING THEOREM AND BOOLEAN COMPLETIONS
- MINIMUM MODELS OF SECOND-ORDER SET THEORIES
- Open determinacy for class games
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: THE EXACT STRENGTH OF THE CLASS FORCING THEOREM