Analytic correlation of inflationary potential to power spectrum shape: limits of validity, and `no-go' for small field model analytics
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:5863304)
Perturbations in context of PDEs (35B20) Quantum optics (81V80) Observational and experimental questions in relativity and gravitational theory (83B05) Approximation procedures, weak fields in general relativity and gravitational theory (83C25) Gravitational energy and conservation laws; groups of motions (83C40) Geometrodynamics and the holographic principle (83E05) Relativistic cosmology (83F05)
Abstract: The primordial power spectrum informs the possible inflationary histories of our universe. Given a power spectrum, the ensuing cosmic microwave background is calculated and compared to the observed one. Thus, one focus of modern cosmology is building well-motivated inflationary models that predict the primordial power spectrum observables. The common practice uses analytic terms for the scalar spectral index and the index running , forgoing the effort required to evaluate the model numerically. However, the validity of these terms has never been rigorously probed and relies on perturbative methods, which may lose their efficacy for large perturbations. The requirement for more accurate theoretical predictions becomes crucial with the advent of highly sensitive measuring instruments. This paper probes the limits of the perturbative treatment that connects inflationary potential parameters to primordial power spectrum observables. We show that the validity of analytic approximations of the scalar index roughly respects the large-field/small-field dichotomy. We supply an easily calculated measure for relative perturbation amplitude and show that, for large field models, the validity of analytical terms extends to perturbation relative to a power-law inflation model. Conversely, the analytical treatment loses its validity for small-field models with as little as perturbation relative to the small-field test-case. By employing the most general artificial neural networks and multinomial functions up to the twentieth degree and demonstrating their shortcomings, we show that no reasonable analytic expressions correlating small field models to the observables the yield exists. Finally, we discuss the possible implications of this work and supply the validity heuristic for large and small field models.
Recommendations
- Probing the initial state of inflation: analytical structure of cosmological correlators
- Inflationary cross-correlations of a non-minimal spectator and their soft limits
- Constraining the inflationary potential with spectral distortions
- Potential reconstruction from general power spectrum in single-field inflation
- Semiclassical analysis of the tensor power spectrum in the Starobinsky inflationary model
- Perturbative analysis of multiple-field cosmological inflation
- The power spectrum for a multi-component inflaton to second-order corrections in the slow-roll expansion
- Precision predictions for the primordial power spectra from f(R) models of inflation
- Power spectrum for perturbations in an inflationary model for a closed universe
- Revisiting small-scale fluctuations in α-attractor models of inflation
Cites work
- A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity
- AdS and the swampland
- An accurate bound on tensor-to-scalar ratio and the scale of inflation
- Constraints on scalar and tensor spectra from \(N_{\mathrm{eff}}\)
- Infinite distances in field space and massless towers of states
- Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems
- Lattice simulations of inflation
- Lossless, scalable implicit likelihood inference for cosmological fields
- Non-singular bouncing cosmology with positive spatial curvature and flat scalar potential
- The density perturbation power spectrum to second-order corrections in the slow-roll expansion
- The synergy between CMB spectral distortions and anisotropies
This page was built for publication: Analytic correlation of inflationary potential to power spectrum shape: limits of validity, and `no-go' for small field model analytics
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5863304)