Discussion: Bayesian Methods: Applied? Yes. Philosophical Defense? In Flux

DOI10.1080/00031305.2012.752410MaRDI QIDQ5877098zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Deborah G. Mayo

Publication date 3 February 2023

Published in The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2012.752410

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Cites work

• An introduction to Bayesian analysis. Theory and methods.
• Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman have agreed on testing? (With comments and a rejoinder).
• Error and inference. Recent exchanges on experimental reasoning, reliability, and the objectivity and rationality of science
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3113188 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3113868 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3059214 (Why is no real title available?)
• Philosophy of statistics.
• Principles of Statistical Inference
• Principles of uncertainty
• Rejoinder: ``The case for objective Bayesian analysis
• Severe Testing as a Basic Concept in a Neyman–Pearson Philosophy of Induction
• The Selection of Prior Distributions by Formal Rules
• “Not Only Defended But Also Applied”: The Perceived Absurdity of Bayesian Inference

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• BayesDA

This page was built for publication: Discussion: Bayesian Methods: Applied? Yes. Philosophical Defense? In Flux

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5877098)