New Statistical Tests for Detecting Disparate Impact Arising From Two-Stage Selection Processes

DOI10.1080/00031305.2014.917054OpenAlexW2098711095WikidataQ58301422 ScholiaQ58301422MaRDI QIDQ5877659FDOQ5877659

Weiwen Miao, Joseph L. Gastwirth

Publication date: 15 February 2023

Published in: The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2014.917054

zbMATH Keywords

statistical evidencediscriminationequal employmentdisparate impacttwo-step testBrunner-Munzel-modified Wilcoxon test

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO MEANS WHEN THE POPULATION VARIANCES ARE UNEQUAL
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The two-sample t test versus satterthwaite's approximate f test
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The impact of Levene's test of equality of variances on statistical theory and practice
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• A combination of Wilcoxon's and Ansari-Bradley's statistics
• Elements of Distribution Theory
• Statistical properties of a measure of tax assessment uniformity
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Adaptive Tests of Significance Using Permutations of Residuals with R and SAS®
• The effect of unequal variances on the power of several two–sample tests

Cited In (1)

• Combining discrimination diagnostics to identify sources of statistical discrimination

This page was built for publication: New Statistical Tests for Detecting Disparate Impact Arising From Two-Stage Selection Processes

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5877659)