Divergence versus decisionP‐values: A distinction worth making in theory and keeping in practice: Or, how divergenceP‐values measure evidence even when decisionP‐values do not

DOI10.1111/SJOS.12625MaRDI QIDQ5889489zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Sander Greenland

Publication date 21 April 2023

Published in Scandinavian Journal of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.02478

zbMATH Keywords

hypothesis testingdecision theorymodel checkingstatistical geometrydivergence measuresstatistical informationsignificance testfalsificationism\(P\)-value\(S\)-valuessurprisals

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Cited in

(8)

• Comments on Divergence vs. Decision P‐values: A Distinction Worth Making in Theory and Keeping in Practice – or, How Divergence P‐values Measure Evidence Even When Decision P‐values Do Not by Greenland in Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 2023
• Evidential Calibration of Confidence Intervals
• Statistical evidence and surprise unified under possibility theory
• Discussion of: ``Specifying prior distributions in reliability applications
• Divergence vs. Decision P-values: A Distinction Worth Making in Theory and Keeping in Practice
• On some publications of Sir David Cox
• Non-Experimental Data, Hypothesis Testing, and the Likelihood Principle: A Social Science Perspective
• Connecting simple and precise P‐values to complex and ambiguous realities (includes rejoinder to comments on “Divergence vs. decision P‐values”)

This page was built for publication: Divergence versus decisionP‐values: A distinction worth making in theory and keeping in practice: Or, how divergenceP‐values measure evidence even when decisionP‐values do not

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5889489)