Divergence versus decisionP‐values: A distinction worth making in theory and keeping in practice: Or, how divergenceP‐values measure evidence even when decisionP‐values do not
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5889489
Cited in
(38)- Connecting simple and precise P‐values to complex and ambiguous realities (includes rejoinder to comments on “Divergence vs. decision P‐values”)
- Comments on Divergence vs. Decision P‐values: A Distinction Worth Making in Theory and Keeping in Practice – or, How Divergence P‐values Measure Evidence Even When Decision P‐values Do Not by Greenland in Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 2023
- Statistical evidence and surprise unified under possibility theory
- Non-Experimental Data, Hypothesis Testing, and the Likelihood Principle: A Social Science Perspective
- Divergence vs. Decision P-values: A Distinction Worth Making in Theory and Keeping in Practice
- Discussion of: ``Specifying prior distributions in reliability applications
- Evidential Calibration of Confidence Intervals
- On some publications of Sir David Cox
- S-values and surprisal intervals to replace P-values and confidence intervals
- Some ways to make regression modeling more helpful than misleading
- Authors' reply to the discussion of `safe testing'
- Zihao Wen and David L. Dowe's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Maozai Tian, Keming Yu and Jiangfeng Wang's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Andrej Srakar's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Judith ter Schure's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Christian P. Robert and Joshua Bon's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Stefano Rizzelli's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Luigi Pace and Alessandra Salvan's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Joris Mulder's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Alexander Ly's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Sander Greenland's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Neil Dey, Ryan Martin, and Jonathan P. Williams' contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Christine P. Chai's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Marco Cattaneo's contribution to the discussion of ``Safe testing by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Joshua bon and christian P. Robert's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Vladimir Vovk's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Wenkai Xu's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide and Koolen
- Christian Hennig's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Glenn Shafer's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Thorsten Dickhaus's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Martin larsson, aaditya ramdas, and johannes Ruf's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de heide, and koolen
- David R. Bickel's contribution to the discussion of `safe testing' by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen
- Seconder of the vote of thanks to Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen and contribution to the discussion of `safe testing'
- Proposer of the vote of thanks to Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen and contribution to the discussion of `safe testing'
- Safe testing
- A small-sample Bayesian information criterion that does not overstate the evidence, with an application to calibrating p-values from likelihood-ratio tests
- Bayesian Model Checking by Betting: A Game-Theoretic Alternative to Bayesian p -values and Classical Bayes Factors
- The Bayes e-value: testing by betting given a prior probability of the null hypothesis
This page was built for publication: Divergence versus decisionP‐values: A distinction worth making in theory and keeping in practice: Or, how divergenceP‐values measure evidence even when decisionP‐values do not
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5889489)
