A formal framework for handling conflicting desires

DOI10.1007/B11792MaRDI QIDQ5900657zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Leila Amgoud

Publication date 6 April 2010

Published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/b11792

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Agent technology and artificial intelligence (68T42)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1844498
• Justifying underlying desires for argument-based reconciliation
• Defeasible Argumentation Support for an Extended BDI Architecture
• Preferences and Assumption-Based Argumentation for Conflict-Free Normative Agents
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2131730

Cited in

(13)

• An argumentation-based approach for identifying and dealing with incompatibilities among procedural goals
• Practical reasoning using values: an argumentative approach based on a hierarchy of values
• Generating possible intentions with constrained argumentation systems
• Defeasible Argumentation Support for an Extended BDI Architecture
• Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
• A logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation: Formalization and logical properties
• On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
• Preferences in artificial intelligence
• Justifying underlying desires for argument-based reconciliation
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2247694 (Why is no real title available?)
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1844498 (Why is no real title available?)
• Partial semantics of argumentation

This page was built for publication: A formal framework for handling conflicting desires

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5900657)