Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs

DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2018.05.004MaRDI QIDQ5915677zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Leila Amgoud, Jonathan Ben-Naim

Publication date 27 June 2018

Published in International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/22378/1/amgoud_22378.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationsemanticsweighted bipolar graphs

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Graph theory (including graph drawing) in computer science (68R10) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Recommendations

• Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
• Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
• Weighted argumentation
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty

Cites work

• A general account of argumentation with preferences
• A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
• Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
• Bipolarity in temporal argumentation frameworks
• Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
• Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
• How to reason defeasibly
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2243383 (Why is no real title available?)
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
• On the qualitative comparison of decisions having positive and negative features
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
• Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results

Cited in

(16)

• Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
• Gradual semantics for weighted bipolar SETAFs
• A Hasse diagram for weighted sceptical semantics with a unique-status grounded semantics
• On the gradual acceptability of arguments in bipolar weighted argumentation frameworks with degrees of trust
• Evaluation of analogical arguments by Choquet integral
• Gradual semantics for logic-based bipolar graphs using t-(co)norms
• Defining argument weighing functions
• Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
• Fuzzy labeling semantics for quantitative argumentation
• A principle-based analysis of bipolar argumentation semantics
• Reasons in weighted argumentation graphs
• Contribution functions for quantitative bipolar argumentation graphs: a principle-based analysis
• Investigation of semantic behavior in probabilistic argumentation
• Integrating user preferences into gradual bipolar argumentation for personalised decision support
• Argumentative review aggregation and dialogical explanations
• Set contribution functions for quantitative bipolar argumentation and their principles

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• OSCAR

This page was built for publication: Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5915677)