Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-61581-3_3MaRDI QIDQ5920075zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Leila Amgoud, Jonathan Ben-Naim

Publication date 5 September 2017

Published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/22378/1/amgoud_22378.pdf

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Graph theory (including graph drawing) in computer science (68R10) Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Recommendations

• Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
• Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
• Weighted argumentation
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6747882
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty

Cited in

(12)

• From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum
• Generalizing complete semantics to bipolar argumentation frameworks
• Delegated updates in epistemic graphs for opponent modelling
• A polynomial-time fragment of epistemic probabilistic argumentation
• Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments
• Open-mindedness of gradual argumentation semantics
• On the gradual acceptability of arguments in bipolar weighted argumentation frameworks with degrees of trust
• Fuzzy intensional semantics
• Evaluation of analogical arguments by Choquet integral
• Gradual semantics for logic-based bipolar graphs using t-(co)norms
• Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
• Contribution functions for quantitative bipolar argumentation graphs: a principle-based analysis

This page was built for publication: Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5920075)