Randomization, balance, and the validity and efficiency of design-adaptive allocation methods

DOI10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00228-7zbMath0976.62099OpenAlexW2063993841MaRDI QIDQ5932169

Aickin, Mikel

Publication date: 25 September 2001

Published in: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-3758(00)00228-7

zbMATH Keywords

simulationclinical trialscomplete randomizationimbalance minimizationlogistic regressionminimum likelihood allocation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Linear regression; mixed models (62J05) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Related Items (7)

Testing hypotheses under covariate-adaptive randomisation and additive models ⋮ Balancing Unobserved Covariates With Covariate-Adaptive Randomized Experiments ⋮ The impact of misclassification on covariate‐adaptive randomized clinical trials ⋮ Handling covariates in the design of clinical trials ⋮ Rerandomization to improve covariate balance in experiments ⋮ Randomization tests in recursive response-adaptive randomization procedures ⋮ Effect of design-adaptive allocation on inference for a regression parameter: Two-group, single-covariate and double-covariate cases

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Some large trial properties of minimum likelihood allocation
• Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization
• Observational studies
• Statistics and Causal Inference
• A Treatment Allocation Procedure for Sequential Clinical Trials
• Characterizing the effect of matching using linear propensity score methods with normal distributions
• Nearly Optimal Allocation of Experimental Units Using Observed Covariate Values
• Experimental Randomization: Who Needs It?
• Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced

This page was built for publication: Randomization, balance, and the validity and efficiency of design-adaptive allocation methods