Performance-based assessment of expertise: how to decide if someone is an expert or not.

DOI10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00113-8zbMath1091.90524DBLPjournals/eor/ShanteauWTP02WikidataQ56047714 ScholiaQ56047714MaRDI QIDQ5953321

Julia C. Pounds, David J. Weiss, James Shanteau, Rickey P. Thomas

Publication date: 2002

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

AgricultureManagementAuditingExpert systemsPsychology

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Theory of languages and software systems (knowledge-based systems, expert systems, etc.) for artificial intelligence (68T35) Mathematical psychology (91E99)

Related Items (5)

Dominance-based rough set approach for group decisions ⋮ Inconsistency indices for pairwise comparisons and the Pareto dominance principle ⋮ Expertise-based ranking of experts: an assessment level approach ⋮ Weights determination of OWA operators by parametric identification ⋮ Characteristics of a process for subjective probability elicitation

Cites Work

• The Comparison of the Sensitivities of Similar Experiments: Model II of the Analysis of Variance
• The Comparison of Different Scales of Measurement for Experimental Results
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Performance-based assessment of expertise: how to decide if someone is an expert or not.