Post-decision inference editing of supportive and counterindicative signals among external auditors in a going concern judgement.

DOI10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00114-XMaRDI QIDQ5953322zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors C. Gustav Lundberg, Brian M. Nagle

Publication date 2002

Published in European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00114-x

zbMATH Keywords

Auditing decisionsGoing concernPost-decision inference editing

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Mathematical psychology (91E99)

Recommendations

• Auditor probability judgments: Discounting unspecified possibilities
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3451179
• Decomposing hindsight bias
• Developments on Experimental Economics
• Good decision vs. good results: outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents

Cited in

(1)

• Models of emerging contexts in risky and complex decision settings

This page was built for publication: Post-decision inference editing of supportive and counterindicative signals among external auditors in a going concern judgement.

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5953322)