Easiness assumptions and hardness tests: Trading time for zero error
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5956013
DOI10.1006/jcss.2001.1763zbMath0988.68221OpenAlexW2021652795MaRDI QIDQ5956013
Publication date: 22 July 2002
Published in: Journal of Computer and System Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://semanticscholar.org/paper/491ad6d93839b13330fed4243c9a4b685fdd6610
Related Items (12)
In search of an easy witness: Exponential time vs. probabilistic polynomial time. ⋮ A zero-one law for RP and derandomization of AM if NP is not small ⋮ Robust simulations and significant separations ⋮ A remark on pseudo proof systems and hard instances of the satisfiability problem ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Pseudorandom generators, typically-correct derandomization, and circuit lower bounds ⋮ Relations between average-case and worst-case complexity ⋮ NONDETERMINISTIC CIRCUIT MINIMIZATION PROBLEM AND DERANDOMIZING ARTHUR-MERLIN GAMES ⋮ Pseudo-random generators for all hardnesses ⋮ Natural Proofs versus Derandomization ⋮ Unions of Disjoint NP-Complete Sets ⋮ Mining circuit lower bound proofs for meta-algorithms
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- One way functions and pseudorandom generators
- \(BPP\) has subexponential time simulations unless \(EXPTIME\) has publishable proofs
- Hardness vs randomness
- A general method to construct oracles realizing given relationships between complexity classes
- Graph nonisomorphism has subexponential size proofs unless the polynomial-time hierarchy collapses
- Circuit minimization problem
- Relativized polynomial hierarchies extending two levels
- On Relativized Polynomial and Exponential Computations
- A Pseudorandom Generator from any One-way Function
- Natural proofs
This page was built for publication: Easiness assumptions and hardness tests: Trading time for zero error