Logical consequence: A defense of Tarski
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5961453
DOI10.1007/BF00265256zbMATH Open0870.03005OpenAlexW2090721665MaRDI QIDQ5961453FDOQ5961453
Authors: Greg Ray
Publication date: 15 September 1997
Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00265256
Recommendations
Cited In (19)
- Prior's defence of Hintikka's theorem. A discussion of Prior's ``The logic of obligation and the obligations of the logician
- Tarski on logical notions
- In defence of a logic for ‘because’
- Tarski's staggering existential assumptions
- New essays on Tarski and philosophy
- A note on formality and logical consequence
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- REREADING TARSKI ON LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- On tarski on models
- Logic: Going farther from Tarski?
- Etchemendy and Bolzano on logical consequence
- Exhibiting interpretational and representational validity
- On exhibiting representational validity
- Ray on Tarski on logical consequence
- Tarski on models and logical consequence
- Should Tarski's idea of consequence operation be revised?
- Tarski on logical consequences
This page was built for publication: Logical consequence: A defense of Tarski
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5961453)