Logical consequence: A defense of Tarski
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5961453
Recommendations
Cited in
(21)- Prior's defence of Hintikka's theorem. A discussion of Prior's ``The logic of obligation and the obligations of the logician
- Tarski on logical notions
- Tarski's staggering existential assumptions
- In defence of a logic for ‘because’
- New essays on Tarski and philosophy
- A note on formality and logical consequence
- REREADING TARSKI ON LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1736368 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5542887 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2076262 (Why is no real title available?)
- Logic: Going farther from Tarski?
- On tarski on models
- The absence of multiple universes of discourse in the 1936 Tarski consequence-definition paper
- Etchemendy and Bolzano on logical consequence
- Models and logical consequence
- Exhibiting interpretational and representational validity
- On exhibiting representational validity
- Ray on Tarski on logical consequence
- Should Tarski's idea of consequence operation be revised?
- Tarski on models and logical consequence
- Tarski on logical consequences
This page was built for publication: Logical consequence: A defense of Tarski
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5961453)