Nested semantics over finite trees are equationally hard
DOI10.1016/j.ic.2004.02.001zbMath1101.68690OpenAlexW2158342623MaRDI QIDQ598202
Luca Aceto, W. J. Fokkink, Anna Ingólfsdóttir, Robert J. van Glabbeek
Publication date: 6 August 2004
Published in: Information and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://www.brics.dk/NS/03/2/
Process algebraConcurrencyBCCSPComplete axiomatizationsEquational logicHennessy--Milner logicNested simulationNested trace semanticsNon-finitely based algebrasPossible futures
Semantics in the theory of computing (68Q55) Models and methods for concurrent and distributed computing (process algebras, bisimulation, transition nets, etc.) (68Q85)
Related Items (10)
Cites Work
- CCS expressions, finite state processes, and three problems of equivalence
- The equational theory of pomsets
- Structured operational semantics and bisimulation as a congruence
- Undecidable equivalences for basic process algebra
- Nonaxiomatisability of equivalences over finite state processes
- The max-plus algebra of the natural numbers has no finite equational basis
- Bisimulation equivalence is decidable for all context-free processes
- Decidability of bisimulation equivalence for process generating context-free languages
- Process algebra for synchronous communication
- Algebraic laws for nondeterminism and concurrency
- Formal verification of parallel programs
- A menagerie of non-finitely based process semantics over BPA* – from ready simulation to completed traces
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: Nested semantics over finite trees are equationally hard