The two halves of disjunctive correctness
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6038484
DOI10.1142/S021906132250026XzbMATH Open1523.03031arXiv2108.13718OpenAlexW4290603492MaRDI QIDQ6038484FDOQ6038484
Authors: Cezary Cieśliński, Bartosz Wcisło
Publication date: 2 May 2023
Published in: Journal of Mathematical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: Ali Enayat had asked whether two halves of Disjunctive Correctness (DC) for the compositional truth predicate are conservative over Peano Arithmetic. In this article, we show that the principle "every true disjunction has a true disjunct" is equivalent to bounded induction for the compositional truth predicate and thus it is not conservative. On the other hand, the converse implication "any disjunction with a true disjunct is true" can be conservatively added to PA. The methods introduced here allow us to give a direct nonconservativeness proof for DC.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.13718
Recommendations
First-order arithmetic and fragments (03F30) Models of arithmetic and set theory (03C62) Nonstandard models of arithmetic (03H15)
Cites Work
- An axiomatic approach to self-referential truth
- Axiomatic theories of truth
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Paradox without Self-Reference
- Construction of Satisfaction Classes for Nonstandard Models
- TRUTH AND FEASIBLE REDUCIBILITY
- Truth, disjunction, and induction
- CONSERVATIVITY FOR THEORIES OF COMPOSITIONAL TRUTH VIA CUT ELIMINATION
- NOTES ON BOUNDED INDUCTION FOR THE COMPOSITIONAL TRUTH PREDICATE
- Local collection and end-extensions of models of compositional truth
- MODEL THEORY AND PROOF THEORY OF THE GLOBAL REFLECTION PRINCIPLE
Cited In (4)
This page was built for publication: The two halves of disjunctive correctness
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6038484)