A Nelsonian Response to ‘the Most Embarrassing of All Twelfth-century Arguments’

DOI10.1080/01445340.2019.1656992zbMath1509.03004OpenAlexW2971768394WikidataQ127290726 ScholiaQ127290726MaRDI QIDQ6043019

Elisángela Ramírez-Cámara, Luis Estrada-González

Publication date: 4 May 2023

Published in: History and Philosophy of Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2019.1656992

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) History of mathematics in Late Antiquity and medieval Europe (01A35) History of mathematical logic and foundations (03-03)

Related Items (2)

Rewriting the history of connexive logic ⋮ Variable sharing in connexive logic

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Negation as cancellation, and connexive logic
• Negation as Cancellation, Connexive Logic, and qLPm
• Leibniz's laws of consistency and the philosophical foundations of connexive logic
• From Paraconsistent Logic to Dialetheic Logic

This page was built for publication: A Nelsonian Response to ‘the Most Embarrassing of All Twelfth-century Arguments’