(1,1)-cluster editing is polynomial-time solvable
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: A graph is a clique graph if is a vertex-disjoin union of cliques. Abu-Khzam (2017) introduced the -{Cluster Editing} problem, where for fixed natural numbers , given a graph and vertex-weights and , we are to decide whether can be turned into a cluster graph by deleting at most edges incident to every and adding at most edges incident to every . Results by Komusiewicz and Uhlmann (2012) and Abu-Khzam (2017) provided a dichotomy of complexity (in P or NP-complete) of -{Cluster Editing} for all pairs apart from Abu-Khzam (2017) conjectured that -{Cluster Editing} is in P. We resolve Abu-Khzam's conjecture in affirmative by (i) providing a serious of five polynomial-time reductions to -free and -free graphs of maximum degree at most 3, and (ii) designing a polynomial-time algorithm for solving -{Cluster Editing} on -free and -free graphs of maximum degree at most 3.
Recommendations
Cites work
- A 2k kernel for the cluster editing problem
- A golden ratio parameterized algorithm for cluster editing
- A more effective linear kernelization for cluster editing
- Cluster editing with locally bounded modifications
- Cluster editing: kernelization based on edge cuts
- Cluster graph modification problems
- Exact algorithms for cluster editing: Evaluation and experiments
- Fixed-parameter tractability of graph modification problems for hereditary properties
- Going weighted: parameterized algorithms for cluster editing
- Graph-modeled data clustering: Exact algorithms for clique generation
- NP-hard problems in hierarchical-tree clustering
- On the complexity of multi-parameterized cluster editing
This page was built for publication: \((1,1)\)-cluster editing is polynomial-time solvable
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6048436)