Girth and λ \lambda ‐choosability of graphs

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6074593




Abstract: Assume k is a positive integer, lambda=k1,k2,...,kq is a partition of k and G is a graph. A lambda-assignment of G is a k-assignment L of G such that the colour set can be partitioned into q subsets C1cupC2cupcdotscupCq and for each vertex v of G, |L(v)capCi|=ki. We say G is lambda-choosable if for each lambda-assignment L of G, G is L-colourable. In particular, if lambda=k, then lambda-choosable is the same as k-choosable, if lambda=1,1,...,1, then lambda-choosable is equivalent to k-colourable. For the other partitions of k sandwiched between k and 1,1,...,1 in terms of refinements, lambda-choosability reveals a complex hierarchy of colourability of graphs. Assume lambda=k1,ldots,kq is a partition of k and lambda is a partition of kgek. We write lambdalelambda if there is a partition lambda=k'1,ldots,k'q of k with k'igeki for i=1,2,ldots,q and lambda is a refinement of lambda. It follows from the definition that if lambdalelambda, then every lambda-choosable graph is lambda-choosable. It was proved in [X. Zhu, A refinement of choosability of graphs, J. Combin. Theory, Ser. B 141 (2020) 143 - 164] that the converse is also true. This paper strengthens this result and proves that for any lambdaotlelambda, for any integer g, there exists a graph of girth at least g which is lambda-choosable but not lambda-choosable.









This page was built for publication: Girth and λ $\lambda $‐choosability of graphs

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6074593)