Distance matrices of a tree: two more invariants, and in a unified framework
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6081116
DOI10.1016/J.EJC.2023.103787arXiv1903.11566MaRDI QIDQ6081116FDOQ6081116
Authors: Projesh Nath Choudhury, Apoorva Khare
Publication date: 25 October 2023
Published in: European Journal of Combinatorics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: Graham-Pollak showed that for the distance matrix of a tree , det depends only on its number of edges. Several other variants of , including directed/multiplicative/- versions were studied, and always, det depends only on the edge-data. We introduce a general framework for bi-directed weighted trees, with threefold significance. First, we improve on state-of-the-art for all known variants, even in the classical Graham-Pollak case: we delete arbitrary pendant nodes (and more general subsets) from the rows/columns of , and show these minors do not depend on the tree-structure. Second, our setting unifies all known variants (with entries in a commutative ring). We further compute in closed form the inverse of , extending a result of Graham-Lovasz [Adv. Math. 1978] and answering a question of Bapat-Lal-Pati [Lin. Alg. Appl. 2006]. Third, we compute a second function of the matrix : the sum of all its cofactors, cof. This was worked out in the simplest setting by Graham-Hoffman-Hosoya (1978), but is relatively unexplored for other variants. We prove a stronger result, in our general setting, by computing cof for minors as above, and showing these too depend only on the edge-data. Finally, we show our setting is the 'most general possible', in that with more freedom in the edgeweights, det and cof depend on the tree structure. In a sense, this completes the study of the invariant det (and cof) for trees with edge-data in a commutative ring. Moreover: for a bi-directed graph we prove multiplicative Graham-Hoffman-Hosoya type formulas for det, cof, . We then show how this subsumes their 1978 result. The final section introduces and computes a third, novel invariant for trees and a Graham-Hoffman-Hosoya type result for our "most general" distance matrix .
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.11566
Recommendations
Graphs and linear algebra (matrices, eigenvalues, etc.) (05C50) Eigenvalues, singular values, and eigenvectors (15A18)
Cites Work
- On the Addressing Problem for Loop Switching
- Distance matrix polynomials of trees
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A \(q\)-analogue of the distance matrix of a tree
- A simple proof of Graham and Pollak's theorem
- Product distance matrix of a tree with matrix weights
- The product distance matrix of a tree with matrix weights on its arcs
- The distance matrix of a tree with weights on its arcs
- The distance matrix of a bidirected tree
- Product distance matrix of a graph and squared distance matrix of a tree
- The mutually beneficial relationship of graphs and matrices
- Combinatorial Nullstellensatz
- On the distance matrix of a directed graph
- On distance matrices and Laplacians
- Inverses of triangular matrices and bipartite graphs
- A combinatorial approach to matrix theory and its applications
- Inverse of the distance matrix of a cactoid digraph
- Inverse of the distance matrix of a cycle-clique graph
- \(q\)-analogs of distance matrices of 3-hypertrees
- The determinants of \(q\)-distance matrices of trees and two quantities relating to permutations
- Inverses of \(q\)-distance matrices of a tree
- On the determinant of \(q\)-distance matrix of a graph
- A \(q\)-analogue of Graham, Hoffman and Hosoya's theorem
Cited In (1)
This page was built for publication: Distance matrices of a tree: two more invariants, and in a unified framework
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6081116)