Distance matrices of a tree: two more invariants, and in a unified framework

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6081116

DOI10.1016/J.EJC.2023.103787arXiv1903.11566MaRDI QIDQ6081116FDOQ6081116


Authors: Projesh Nath Choudhury, Apoorva Khare Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 25 October 2023

Published in: European Journal of Combinatorics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Graham-Pollak showed that for D=DT the distance matrix of a tree T, det(D) depends only on its number of edges. Several other variants of D, including directed/multiplicative/q- versions were studied, and always, det(D) depends only on the edge-data. We introduce a general framework for bi-directed weighted trees, with threefold significance. First, we improve on state-of-the-art for all known variants, even in the classical Graham-Pollak case: we delete arbitrary pendant nodes (and more general subsets) from the rows/columns of D, and show these minors do not depend on the tree-structure. Second, our setting unifies all known variants (with entries in a commutative ring). We further compute in closed form the inverse of D, extending a result of Graham-Lovasz [Adv. Math. 1978] and answering a question of Bapat-Lal-Pati [Lin. Alg. Appl. 2006]. Third, we compute a second function of the matrix D: the sum of all its cofactors, cof(D). This was worked out in the simplest setting by Graham-Hoffman-Hosoya (1978), but is relatively unexplored for other variants. We prove a stronger result, in our general setting, by computing cof(.) for minors as above, and showing these too depend only on the edge-data. Finally, we show our setting is the 'most general possible', in that with more freedom in the edgeweights, det(D) and cof(D) depend on the tree structure. In a sense, this completes the study of the invariant det(DT) (and cof(DT)) for trees T with edge-data in a commutative ring. Moreover: for a bi-directed graph G we prove multiplicative Graham-Hoffman-Hosoya type formulas for det(DG), cof(DG), DG1. We then show how this subsumes their 1978 result. The final section introduces and computes a third, novel invariant for trees and a Graham-Hoffman-Hosoya type result for our "most general" distance matrix DT.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.11566




Recommendations



Cites Work


Cited In (1)





This page was built for publication: Distance matrices of a tree: two more invariants, and in a unified framework

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6081116)