The evidence approach to paraconsistency versus the paraconsistent approach to evidence

DOI10.1007/s11229-020-02813-xzbMath1525.03088OpenAlexW3047081339MaRDI QIDQ6088508

Jonas Rafael Becker Arenhart

Publication date: 14 December 2023

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02813-x

zbMATH Keywords

evidencedialetheismparaconsistent logicscontradictionslogic as modeling

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Paraconsistent logics (03B53)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Liberating paraconsistency from contradiction
• Paraconsistent logic, evidence, and justification
• An epistemic approach to paraconsistency: a logic of evidence and truth
• Paraconsistent logic: consistency, contradiction and negation
• Paraconsistency and its Philosophical Interpretations
• What is a Paraconsistent Logic?
• Analetheism and dialetheism
• Squeezing arguments
• On the Philosophy and Mathematics of the Logics of Formal Inconsistency
• Measuring evidence: a probabilistic approach to an extension of Belnap-Dunn logic

This page was built for publication: The evidence approach to paraconsistency versus the paraconsistent approach to evidence