Mental models of dynamic systems are different: adjusting for heterogeneous granularity

DOI10.1016/J.EJOR.2023.07.003MaRDI QIDQ6090166zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Martin FG. Schaffernicht, Stefan N. Groesser

Publication date 14 November 2023

Published in European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.07.003

zbMATH Keywords

dominant logicmental modelsmethodologymodel comparisonproblem structuringqualitative modelssystem dynamics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Operations research and management science (90Bxx)

Cites work

• An empirical investigation into the learning effects of management flight simulators: a mental models approach
• Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems
• Building confidence in models for multiple audiences: The modelling cascade
• Cognitive mapping expert views for policy analysis in the public sector.
• Enhancing public participation in natural resource management using soft OR -- an application of strategic option development and analysis in tactical forest planning.
• Graph theoretic foundations of pathfinder networks
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 52884 (Why is no real title available?)
• Structuring a delay and disruption claim: An application of cause-mapping and system dynamics.
• Surveying applications of strategic options development and analysis (SODA) from 1989 to 2018
• The SEXTANT software: a tool for automating the comparative analysis of mental models of dynamic systems

Cited in

(1)

• More graduated but less promoted: a dynamic perspective of the leaky pipeline of women in academic science, technology, engineering, and mathematics

This page was built for publication: Mental models of dynamic systems are different: adjusting for heterogeneous granularity

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6090166)