Improved generalized raking estimators to address dependent covariate and failure‐time outcome error
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6091680
Abstract: Biomedical studies that use electronic health records (EHR) data for inference are often subject to bias due to measurement error. The measurement error present in EHR data is typically complex, consisting of errors of unknown functional form in covariates and the outcome, which can be dependent. To address the bias resulting from such errors, generalized raking has recently been proposed as a robust method that yields consistent estimates without the need to model the error structure. We provide rationale for why these previously proposed raking estimators can be expected to be inefficient in failure-time outcome settings involving misclassification of the event indicator. We propose raking estimators that utilize multiple imputation, to impute either the target variables or auxiliary variables, to improve the efficiency. We also consider outcome-dependent sampling designs and investigate their impact on the efficiency of the raking estimators, either with or without multiple imputation. We present an extensive numerical study to examine the performance of the proposed estimators across various measurement error settings. We then apply the proposed methods to our motivating setting, in which we seek to analyze HIV outcomes in an observational cohort with electronic health records data from the Vanderbilt Comprehensive Care Clinic.
Cites work
- A Model-Calibration Approach to Using Complete Auxiliary Information From Survey Data
- Accounting for dependent errors in predictors and time-to-event outcomes using electronic health records, validation samples and multiple imputation
- Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling
- Combining inverse probability weighting and multiple imputation to improve robustness of estimation
- Connections between survey calibration estimators and semiparametric models for incomplete data
- Design and Analysis of Two-Phase Studies with Binary Outcome Applied to Wilms Tumour Prognosis
- Discrete Proportional Hazards Models for Mismeasured Outcomes
- Estimation of Regression Coefficients When Some Regressors Are Not Always Observed
- Evaluating risk-prediction models using data from electronic health records
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2140075 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3080959 (Why is no real title available?)
- Inference for imputation estimators
- Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models
- Miscellanea. Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple imputation
- Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification
- Survey Design Under the Regression Superpopulation Model
- Weighted likelihood estimation under two-phase sampling
Cited in
(4)- Optimal multiwave validation of secondary use data with outcome and exposure misclassification
- Optimal sampling for design-based estimators of regression models
- Three-phase generalized raking and multiple imputation estimators to address error-prone data
- Ascertainment conditional maximum likelihood for continuous outcome under two-phase response-selective design
This page was built for publication: Improved generalized raking estimators to address dependent covariate and failure‐time outcome error
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6091680)